THE decision of the Chief Minister of Gilgit-Baltistan, Amjad Hussain Azar, to hold regular open kutchehries (public hearings) is a highly commendable initiative and a welcome augury for the future of governance in the region. At a time when a considerable segment of the population finds it exceedingly difficult to gain access to public functionaries, this people-centric approach reflects a leadership that is willing to listen directly to the voices of ordinary citizens. It is an encouraging departure from the traditional bureaucratic culture where the corridors of power often remain inaccessible to the poor, the underprivileged, and those residing in far-flung valleys of Gilgit-Baltistan.
For countless citizens, approaching government offices to seek redress of genuine grievances is itself a daunting ordeal. Administrative procedures are often lengthy, multiple offices have to be visited, and in many cases, the absence of influence or personal connections leaves deserving citizens without any effective remedy. Consequently, problems that could be resolved within days continue to linger for months or even years, causing unnecessary hardship and eroding public confidence in government institutions.
Open kutchehries provide an effective antidote to this predicament. By meeting citizens face-to-face, the Chief Minister acquires first-hand knowledge of the actual difficulties confronting the people instead of relying solely on official reports and bureaucratic briefings, which do not always present the complete picture. Such direct interaction enables immediate decision-making, promotes transparency, strengthens accountability, and, above all, restores the public's confidence that the government remains accessible to every citizen irrespective of social or economic standing.
Equally important is the moral message conveyed through such public hearings. They affirm that governance is fundamentally about serving people rather than merely administering rules. Citizens who are heard with dignity develop trust in public institutions, while officials become more aware of the human consequences of administrative delays and procedural complexities. Listening, after all, is the first step towards responsive governance.
However, if this commendable initiative is to yield enduring and transformative results, it should not remain confined to the office of the Chief Minister alone. It should evolve into an institutional culture permeating every tier of the Government of Gilgit-Baltistan. All Administrative Secretaries, Heads of Departments, Deputy Commissioners, Directors General, and heads of autonomous bodies and public service institutions should be instructed to organise periodic public kutchehries within their respective jurisdictions.
Departments such as Revenue, Health, Education, Police, Local Government, Public Works, Water and Power, Excise and Taxation, Social Welfare, Agriculture, Municipal Services, and district administrations deal with thousands of citizens every month. Regular public hearings by these departments would enable officers to identify procedural bottlenecks, eliminate unnecessary delays, detect instances of maladministration, and provide timely relief to deserving citizens without compelling them to make repeated visits to government offices.
In the contemporary digital era, however, responsive governance cannot remain confined to physical meetings alone. Social media has emerged as the most accessible platform through which ordinary citizens—particularly the poor, the elderly, persons with disabilities, and residents of remote areas—bring their grievances to the attention of the authorities. Every day, numerous appeals concerning pensions, educational issues, healthcare, land disputes, public utilities, municipal services, police matters, and other administrative concerns are posted on various social media platforms. Many of these appeals are genuine cries for help rather than expressions of criticism.
It is, therefore, imperative that the Government of Gilgit-Baltistan issue comprehensive directions requiring all Heads of Departments and district administrations to regularly monitor credible public complaints appearing on social media and initiate prompt action wherever such grievances fall within their jurisdiction. A responsible administration should treat every bona fide public complaint as an opportunity to improve governance rather than as an inconvenience.
Such a policy would prove immensely beneficial for the poor citizenry. Many people lack the financial means, mobility, or influence required to pursue their grievances through conventional administrative channels. A responsive system that acknowledges and acts upon genuine social media complaints would spare them repeated journeys to government offices, reduce dependence on intermediaries, and ensure quicker delivery of public services.
The benefits of such responsiveness extend beyond administrative efficiency. A significant proportion of litigation reaching the courts arises not because of complex legal disputes but because government departments fail to respond to legitimate grievances in time. Administrative silence, procrastination, and procedural delays often compel citizens to seek judicial intervention as a last resort. If departments address complaints promptly and fairly at the initial stage, many disputes can be resolved administratively, thereby avoiding unnecessary litigation.
Such an approach would significantly reduce the burden on the judiciary, allowing courts to devote their valuable time and resources to adjudicating genuinely complex legal questions rather than matters that could have been resolved through efficient administrative action. In this way, responsive governance strengthens not only the executive but also the overall justice delivery system.
To institutionalise this vision, the Government should consider establishing a Chief Minister's Public Grievance Monitoring Cell within the Chief Minister's Secretariat. This specialised unit should function as the central coordinating mechanism for receiving, registering, monitoring, and following up complaints received through the Chief Minister's kutchehries, departmental public hearings, official complaint portals, and verified social media platforms.
Every complaint should be digitally registered, assigned a unique tracking number, and transmitted electronically to the concerned department with clearly prescribed timelines for disposal. Departments should be required to submit periodic progress reports, while unresolved or delayed cases should automatically be escalated to higher authorities for review. Citizens should also be informed about the action taken on their complaints, thereby ensuring transparency throughout the grievance redressal process.
The Monitoring Cell should not merely function as a complaint forwarding office. It should maintain a comprehensive database capable of identifying recurring public issues, evaluating departmental performance, highlighting systemic weaknesses, and recommending policy reforms. Quarterly and annual reports indicating the number of complaints received, disposed of, pending, and the average time taken for their resolution should be placed in the public domain. Such transparency would substantially enhance public confidence in government institutions.
Simultaneously, grievance redressal should become an important criterion in evaluating the performance of administrative departments. Officers demonstrating exceptional responsiveness, empathy, integrity, and efficiency should be publicly acknowledged and rewarded, while persistent negligence, indifference, or failure to resolve public grievances within stipulated timelines should attract appropriate administrative scrutiny. Such a performance-based system would encourage healthy competition among departments and reinforce the principle that public office is fundamentally a public trust.
The Chief Minister has, through his initiative of open kutchehries, laid the foundation for a new culture of participatory governance in Gilgit-Baltistan. The challenge now is to transform this laudable initiative into a permanent institutional practice across the entire administrative structure. Governance becomes truly effective not merely when governments formulate policies, but when they remain accessible, listen attentively, respond promptly, and resolve problems compassionately.
If periodic public kutchehries, proactive departmental outreach, systematic monitoring of genuine public grievances on social media, and a robust Chief Minister's Public Grievance Monitoring Cell are integrated into the administrative framework, Gilgit-Baltistan can emerge as a model of responsive, transparent, accountable, and citizen-centric governance. Such reforms would narrow the distance between the government and the governed, reduce corruption and bureaucratic inertia, minimise avoidable litigation, lessen the burden on the judiciary, and restore the confidence of ordinary citizens in public institutions.
Ultimately, the true greatness of any government lies not in the magnificence of its offices or the authority of its functionaries, but in its willingness to hear the weakest voice, respond to the humblest appeal, and deliver justice with compassion and integrity. The Chief Minister has taken an inspiring first step. If the entire administrative machinery follows his example with sincerity and commitment, Gilgit-Baltistan will not only witness more effective governance but will also establish a benchmark of public administration worthy of emulation throughout Pakistan.
Comments