Skip to main content

Gilgit Needs an Airport for the Future—not an Airport of the Past


THERE are occasions when a long-standing demand ceases to be a demand and becomes an imperative. The construction of a new, modern airport at Gilgit is now precisely such an imperative.

As reported on social media on 16 July 2026, the Chief Minister of Gilgit-Baltistan has, in his letter dated 15 July 2026 addressed to the Prime Minister of Pakistan, most justifiably drawn attention to the urgent need for a new airport at Gilgit. The appeal deserves the serious and positive consideration of the federal government—not as another routine administrative request, but as a matter of overriding importance for the future of Gilgit-Baltistan.

It is, indeed, difficult to understand why the issue continues to linger.

Gilgit-Baltistan has changed dramatically. Its aviation infrastructure has not.

The region has emerged as one of Pakistan's most coveted tourist destinations and has earned international recognition, having been included by CNN Travel among the world's 25 destinations worth visiting in 2025. The influx of national and international tourists has increased manifold. Hunza, Naltar, Ghizer, Astore, Diamer and the adjoining valleys now attract visitors from across the country and beyond. Yet the principal gateway to the heart of Gilgit-Baltistan continues to operate with facilities and limitations that belong to an earlier era.

The present Gilgit Airport has served the region with distinction for decades, first accommodating Fokker aircraft and later ATRs. Both, however, remained subject to the perennial caveat of “subject to weather” and have increasingly proved inadequate to meet the region's growing aviation and tourism needs. One must acknowledge its contribution. But respect for the past cannot justify an indefinite refusal to prepare for the future.

I distinctly recall that, approximately five years ago, it was reported that a plan for a new airport at Gilgit was under consideration and that a technical team had visited the area to explore a suitable site. I had also referred to the matter in my article “Upgrading Aviation Facilities,” published on this blog on 31 July 2021. Since then, however, the proposal seems to have vanished into the mysterious corridors of officialdom.

What happened to it?

Was a suitable site not found? Did the proposal encounter financial constraints? Was there a technical objection? Or did it simply become another victim of bureaucratic inertia? The people of Gilgit-Baltistan deserve to know.

The contrast with Skardu is particularly striking. The upgrading of Skardu International Airport and the expansion of aviation facilities there have demonstrated the transformative role that modern air connectivity can play in the tourism economy of Gilgit-Baltistan. If Skardu can be equipped with aviation infrastructure commensurate with its growing importance, why should Gilgit continue to be treated as an exception?

The matter is far more serious than tourism alone.

For a mountainous region, air connectivity is not a luxury—it is a lifeline. Road travel is indispensable, but the region's rugged terrain, landslides, avalanches and harsh weather conditions frequently create uncertainty and delay. A modern airport at Gilgit would facilitate the movement of tourists, residents, patients, students, professionals, investors and government officials alike.

It would also open a new chapter in the economic development of the region.

A properly planned airport would stimulate tourism, expand the hospitality sector, create employment and encourage investment. It would also make Gilgit a more effective regional hub for the movement of people and goods. Above all, it would provide a much-needed sense of connectivity to a region whose geographical isolation has historically imposed enormous costs upon its people.

There is, moreover, a larger national and strategic dimension to the matter. Gilgit-Baltistan is not merely a landscape of spectacular mountains and tourist resorts. It occupies a position of immense national and strategic importance. Modern aviation infrastructure in Gilgit should therefore be viewed as an investment in national connectivity, regional integration and the economic future of Pakistan.

One cannot help but wonder why the proposal that was reportedly under consideration years ago has apparently remained shelved. Projects of such consequence must not be permitted to die quietly in files.

The Chief Minister's recent intervention is, therefore, both timely and welcome. It provides the federal government with an opportunity to revive a proposal whose importance has only increased with the passage of time.

Gilgit does not need another ceremonial announcement. It needs a decision.

The government should immediately revive the earlier proposal, identify and publicly disclose the reasons for its delay, commission a fresh technical and feasibility assessment where necessary, and announce a clear timeline for the construction of a modern airport at Gilgit—one broadly compatible with the aviation facilities now being developed at Skardu.

The future will not wait for bureaucratic files to move from one table to another.

Gilgit-Baltistan is attracting the world. It is now the responsibility of the state to ensure that the region has an airport capable of receiving it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Episode 1: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-I, The Muslim dated July 4, 1997. By Syed Shamsuddin   Most of our people even today seem quite oblivious of the geo-political position of Northern Areas while the exact historical background concerning Gilgit-Baltistan and where these must stand politically remains yet another subject of discussion. Not to speak of a layman, a person of the stature of Chief Executive of the country, once inquired whether the Northern Areas an integral part of the north west frontier province (NWFP). This happened when he rule the country in the aftermath of martial law. Yet another minister on Kashmir and Northern Areas, during the democratic government that followed, was pleased to tell a member of the northern areas council that he owed his minisitership not to them (Northern Areas people) but to the turbaned man of his constituency, standing at the door of his official chambers. There is infact, dearth of substantial historical evidence as to when exactly man ...

Episode 4: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan part-1

A window to Northern Areas-IV, The Muslim dated July 7, 1997 Author: Syed Shams ud Din    The word providence in Sheena language equates with ‘bagharo’ and in this sense, it may safely be implied that the term Bagrote emanated from this word as the valley once famous for its agricultural produce, wildlife and richness in fruits hence the people living there were used to be called ‘bagharoos’ – those distributing basic necessities of life. This attribute seems to have later degenerated into Bagrote – the land of ‘bagharoos’ (distributors).  It has been noticed that the famous mythology of Gilgit is all in Brushiski which also includes that of Kirak Prince. The attribution of all the names to almost all places of what was formerly called the Brushal are a pointer to the firm hold of this kingdom in the past as a reality. The people of these areas, prior to Islam, all embraced ‘Shamanism’. A cursory glance over the ancient history of India may abundantly reveal the fa...

Episode 3: A Windows to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-III, The Muslim dated July 6,1997 Author: Syed Shamsuddin    In the ‘History of Jammu and Kashmir’ by Maulvi Hashmatullah Khan Lakhnavi, there is a mention of ancient rulers (Rajas) of Gilgit called Aghurtham and Baghurtham who have been famous rulers of Brushal. It is to be noted that the word ‘Tham’ in Brushaski means ruler. When delved deep, it transpires that the words like Berish (the land of Berish), Malokush, Kanjukush etc.,  were further embellished by the Tibetans, the Baltis and Ladakhis by pronouncing at ease as like Brushal in their own tongue. The Aghutham’s rock still lies amidst Gilgit river near Thopchar in Gilgit city which is called “Aghurthamai Giri”. Likewise, Aghurtham’s Forte is situated at Konodas, Gilgit near Gulsher Mohellah where the remains are. It has been observed that the carvings on the above rock and that of the Karagha nullah and the one at Hal Nal near Nagaral are identical and hence seem to have been engrave...