Skip to main content

The Vanishing Public Spaces of Gilgit-Baltistan: A Civic Challenge for the Future


RAPID urbanization is often regarded as a sign of progress and economic growth. However, when urban expansion occurs without proper planning and provision of civic amenities, it can gradually erode the very quality of life it seeks to improve. Across Gilgit-Baltistan, particularly in and around the expanding urban centres, one of the most neglected aspects of development is the preservation and creation of public spaces, parks, playgrounds, and community recreation facilities.

Traditionally, the settlements of Gilgit-Baltistan were not merely clusters of houses. Villages were designed around communal spaces that fostered social interaction, cultural cohesion, and physical recreation. Among these were the cherished beyaks (community gathering spaces), village squares, polo grounds, open fields, and other common areas where people met, discussed community affairs, celebrated festivals, resolved disputes, and strengthened social bonds.

These spaces served purposes far beyond recreation. They were the heart of community life, nurturing social harmony, cultural continuity, and collective identity. Children played freely, youth engaged in sports, elders exchanged wisdom, and communities came together during important social and cultural occasions.

Unfortunately, with the increasing pressure of population growth, commercialization, and unregulated construction, many of these traditional public spaces have either disappeared entirely or have shrunk to a fraction of their original size. In numerous localities, valuable communal lands have gradually been encroached upon, subdivided, or converted into residential and commercial properties. As a result, the younger generation is increasingly deprived of safe and accessible spaces for recreation and social engagement.

The situation is particularly alarming in the rapidly urbanizing belt surrounding Gilgit city. Localities such as Sakwar, Minawar, Basin, Danyore, Sultanabad, Jutal, Oshikhandas, Jalalabad and Champogarh have witnessed substantial residential growth over recent decades. Yet, many of these expanding settlements continue to lack properly developed public parks, playgrounds, walking tracks, community centres, and recreational facilities that are considered basic urban necessities elsewhere in the world.

The absence of such facilities has multiple consequences. Children are forced to play on roads or in unsafe environments. Young people have fewer opportunities to engage in healthy sporting activities. Families lack accessible venues for leisure and recreation. The elderly are deprived of peaceful public spaces where they can walk, socialize, and remain physically active. In the long run, the social and health costs of such neglect can be substantial.

Equally important is the preservation of traditional polo grounds, which hold immense cultural significance in Gilgit-Baltistan. Polo is not merely a sport in the region; it is an integral part of its historical and cultural heritage. Encroachment upon polo grounds and open playing fields threatens not only recreational opportunities but also an important aspect of the region's identity. These grounds must be protected and upgraded as heritage recreational assets for future generations.

The need of the hour is comprehensive urban planning guided by long-term vision rather than short-term expediency. Every town expansion scheme, housing colony, and municipal development project should be governed by a legally enforceable Master Plan that allocates adequate land for public parks, playgrounds, green belts, community centres, and open recreational spaces before residential and commercial plots are approved.

Urban planners across the world generally regard public open spaces as essential infrastructure, just as important as roads, water supply, electricity, and drainage systems. Parks and playgrounds are not luxuries; they are fundamental civic amenities that contribute to public health, environmental sustainability, social cohesion, and the overall livability of a city.

For Gilgit-Baltistan, where breathtaking natural landscapes coexist with rapidly expanding settlements, there exists a unique opportunity to avoid the mistakes made elsewhere. The region can still integrate green spaces, preserve traditional beyaks, protect polo grounds, and create modern recreational facilities as part of a balanced development strategy.

The responsibility lies with policymakers, municipal authorities, planning agencies, elected representatives, and local communities alike. Development should not be measured solely by the number of buildings erected or roads constructed. A truly developed society is one that also safeguards the spaces where its people gather, interact, exercise, celebrate, and connect with one another.

If timely measures are not taken today, future generations may inherit densely populated settlements devoid of the communal and recreational spaces that once defined the social fabric of Gilgit-Baltistan. The preservation and creation of public spaces, therefore, is not merely an urban planning concern—it is an investment in the social, cultural, physical, and environmental well-being of the region for decades to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Episode 1: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-I, The Muslim dated July 4, 1997. By Syed Shamsuddin   Most of our people even today seem quite oblivious of the geo-political position of Northern Areas while the exact historical background concerning Gilgit-Baltistan and where these must stand politically remains yet another subject of discussion. Not to speak of a layman, a person of the stature of Chief Executive of the country, once inquired whether the Northern Areas an integral part of the north west frontier province (NWFP). This happened when he rule the country in the aftermath of martial law. Yet another minister on Kashmir and Northern Areas, during the democratic government that followed, was pleased to tell a member of the northern areas council that he owed his minisitership not to them (Northern Areas people) but to the turbaned man of his constituency, standing at the door of his official chambers. There is infact, dearth of substantial historical evidence as to when exactly man ...

Episode 4: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan part-1

A window to Northern Areas-IV, The Muslim dated July 7, 1997 Author: Syed Shams ud Din    The word providence in Sheena language equates with ‘bagharo’ and in this sense, it may safely be implied that the term Bagrote emanated from this word as the valley once famous for its agricultural produce, wildlife and richness in fruits hence the people living there were used to be called ‘bagharoos’ – those distributing basic necessities of life. This attribute seems to have later degenerated into Bagrote – the land of ‘bagharoos’ (distributors).  It has been noticed that the famous mythology of Gilgit is all in Brushiski which also includes that of Kirak Prince. The attribution of all the names to almost all places of what was formerly called the Brushal are a pointer to the firm hold of this kingdom in the past as a reality. The people of these areas, prior to Islam, all embraced ‘Shamanism’. A cursory glance over the ancient history of India may abundantly reveal the fa...

Episode 3: A Windows to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-III, The Muslim dated July 6,1997 Author: Syed Shamsuddin    In the ‘History of Jammu and Kashmir’ by Maulvi Hashmatullah Khan Lakhnavi, there is a mention of ancient rulers (Rajas) of Gilgit called Aghurtham and Baghurtham who have been famous rulers of Brushal. It is to be noted that the word ‘Tham’ in Brushaski means ruler. When delved deep, it transpires that the words like Berish (the land of Berish), Malokush, Kanjukush etc.,  were further embellished by the Tibetans, the Baltis and Ladakhis by pronouncing at ease as like Brushal in their own tongue. The Aghutham’s rock still lies amidst Gilgit river near Thopchar in Gilgit city which is called “Aghurthamai Giri”. Likewise, Aghurtham’s Forte is situated at Konodas, Gilgit near Gulsher Mohellah where the remains are. It has been observed that the carvings on the above rock and that of the Karagha nullah and the one at Hal Nal near Nagaral are identical and hence seem to have been engrave...