Skip to main content

A Recurrent Tragedy Rooted in Institutional Neglect


The Cost of Unsafe Labor and Negligent Infrastructure in Gilgit-Baltistan

As reported by Pamirtimes on 29 December 2025, the death of Mujeeb ur Rahman, a foreman of the Power Department electrocuted while repairing transmission lines in Passu, cannot be dismissed as a tragic accident. It is a stark indictment of systemic negligence, bureaucratic indifference, and the persistent failure to protect frontline utility workers in Gilgit-Baltistan. His burial in Gulmit, amid widespread public anger, reflected not only collective grief but also mounting outrage against an institution that repeatedly exposes its employees to mortal danger.

This tragedy is not isolated. A near-identical fatality was recently reported from Astore, while earlier deaths have occurred in Danyore and other parts of Gilgit. Together, these incidents reveal a lethal pattern rather than unfortunate coincidence.

Known Risks, Ignored Duties

Residents and workers consistently testify that Power Department personnel are routinely directed to work on live transmission lines without basic safety arrangements. Essential protections—insulated gloves, helmets, safety harnesses, voltage detectors, lockout–tagout systems, and emergency preparedness—are either unavailable or entirely absent. This is not simple oversight; it is reckless endangerment that violates elementary occupational safety principles.

The absence of standard personal protective equipment, enforced safety protocols, proper high-voltage training, and functional emergency response systems has transformed routine maintenance into a deadly gamble where workers risk their lives against institutional neglect.

Negligence Beyond the Workplace

Equally alarming is the department’s casual and often arbitrary approach to laying electricity lines and installing pylons along roads. Poor planning and misalignment have, in several instances, resulted in live high-voltage wires intruding into private properties and residential compounds, exposing entire families to continuous danger.

One such case occurred along Shabakee Mohellah, where live wires from a high-voltage line originating near the Karakoram Highway (KKH) were misdirected along the Shabakee Mohellah Link Road. These wires intruded into a residential compound, repeatedly coming into contact with a decades-old walnut tree—posing a perennial threat to life and property. Despite persistent complaints, the hazard remains unaddressed. This illustrates that negligence is not episodic but embedded in planning, execution, and oversight.

A Pattern of Death, Not Accident

Each fatality follows the same grim script: hazardous assignment, absence of protection, loss of life, public outrage, hollow assurances, and eventual silence—until the next tragedy. Such repetition strips away any claim of accident. These deaths are foreseeable, preventable, and therefore institutional failures.

Administrative Collapse and Accountability Vacuum

The continued non-provision of safety measures reflects failure at every level: budgeting that ignores worker safety, procurement systems that fail to deliver essential gear, supervisory officers who do not enforce compliance, and an administration that fixes responsibility nowhere. The absence of transparent, independent inquiries ensures that negligence faces no consequence and therefore persists.

The Human Cost and the Moral Imperative

Mujeeb ur Rahman was not a statistic. He was a husband, a father, and a provider whose family now faces grief and insecurity. Compensation, while necessary, cannot redeem a life lost to preventable neglect. Compensation without reform merely monetizes death.

Conclusion

This recurring loss of life—of workers and the constant endangerment of civilians—is not destiny. It is institutional neglect made fatal. Unless decisive reforms, transparent accountability, and immediate safety provisioning are enforced, every future death will stand as a collective moral failure—one history will record not with sympathy, but with condemnation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Episode 1: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-I, The Muslim dated July 4, 1997. By Syed Shamsuddin   Most of our people even today seem quite oblivious of the geo-political position of Northern Areas while the exact historical background concerning Gilgit-Baltistan and where these must stand politically remains yet another subject of discussion. Not to speak of a layman, a person of the stature of Chief Executive of the country, once inquired whether the Northern Areas an integral part of the north west frontier province (NWFP). This happened when he rule the country in the aftermath of martial law. Yet another minister on Kashmir and Northern Areas, during the democratic government that followed, was pleased to tell a member of the northern areas council that he owed his minisitership not to them (Northern Areas people) but to the turbaned man of his constituency, standing at the door of his official chambers. There is infact, dearth of substantial historical evidence as to when exactly man ...

Episode 4: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan part-1

A window to Northern Areas-IV, The Muslim dated July 7, 1997 Author: Syed Shams ud Din    The word providence in Sheena language equates with ‘bagharo’ and in this sense, it may safely be implied that the term Bagrote emanated from this word as the valley once famous for its agricultural produce, wildlife and richness in fruits hence the people living there were used to be called ‘bagharoos’ – those distributing basic necessities of life. This attribute seems to have later degenerated into Bagrote – the land of ‘bagharoos’ (distributors).  It has been noticed that the famous mythology of Gilgit is all in Brushiski which also includes that of Kirak Prince. The attribution of all the names to almost all places of what was formerly called the Brushal are a pointer to the firm hold of this kingdom in the past as a reality. The people of these areas, prior to Islam, all embraced ‘Shamanism’. A cursory glance over the ancient history of India may abundantly reveal the fa...

Episode 3: A Windows to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-III, The Muslim dated July 6,1997 Author: Syed Shamsuddin    In the ‘History of Jammu and Kashmir’ by Maulvi Hashmatullah Khan Lakhnavi, there is a mention of ancient rulers (Rajas) of Gilgit called Aghurtham and Baghurtham who have been famous rulers of Brushal. It is to be noted that the word ‘Tham’ in Brushaski means ruler. When delved deep, it transpires that the words like Berish (the land of Berish), Malokush, Kanjukush etc.,  were further embellished by the Tibetans, the Baltis and Ladakhis by pronouncing at ease as like Brushal in their own tongue. The Aghutham’s rock still lies amidst Gilgit river near Thopchar in Gilgit city which is called “Aghurthamai Giri”. Likewise, Aghurtham’s Forte is situated at Konodas, Gilgit near Gulsher Mohellah where the remains are. It has been observed that the carvings on the above rock and that of the Karagha nullah and the one at Hal Nal near Nagaral are identical and hence seem to have been engrave...