Skip to main content

Synergizing Forestry and Agriculture in Gilgit-Baltistan: A Call for Coordinated Innovation Amidst Climate Challenges



IN THE WAKE of escalating climate change impacts and mounting land-use pressures, the Forest and Agriculture Departments of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) stand at a defining juncture. The region’s fragile mountain ecosystems, once protected by their remoteness, are now increasingly exposed to erratic weather patterns, glacial retreat, soil degradation, and shrinking cultivable land. Under these circumstances, coordinated and synergistic action between the two departments is not only desirable but inevitable to ensure ecological stability, food security, and sustainable livelihoods for local communities.

1. Convergence of Mandates: Forests and Farms as Complementary Systems

Historically, forestry and agriculture have operated as distinct sectors. However, in a mountainous and land-scarce region like Gilgit-Baltistan—where every patch of arable land is precious—this compartmentalized approach no longer serves the realities on the ground.
The Forest Department focuses on conserving natural forests, preventing soil erosion, and maintaining biodiversity, while the Agriculture Department strives to enhance productivity and promote food security. Their objectives now intersect, as both aim to safeguard the same land resources under increasing stress from climatic variability and human demands.

Integrating forestry and agriculture through agroforestry models, community woodlots, fruit-bearing tree plantations, and soil conservation initiatives can ensure that every piece of land yields multiple ecological and economic benefits—trees for soil stability and microclimate regulation, and crops for sustenance and income.

2. The Imperative of Innovation and Technology Adoption

This is an era that demands innovative thinking, experimentation, and adaptive practices. Both departments must actively collaborate to introduce and promote:

  • Dwarf and high-yielding tree species suited to small compounds and marginal lands.

  • Drip and micro-irrigation systems that maximize water efficiency in plantation and crop cultivation.

  • Climate-resilient crop-tree combinations (e.g., intercropping fruit trees with legumes or vegetables).

  • Controlled environment nurseries and gene banks to preserve and propagate native and hybrid species adapted to varying altitudes.

  • Remote sensing and GIS-based mapping to monitor forest health, watershed stability, and land-use changes.

By institutionalizing such practices, both departments can spearhead a new phase of climate-smart resource management across GB’s diverse ecological zones—from the lower valleys of Diamer and Ghizer to the high-altitude settlements of Hunza, Skardu, and Gojal.

3. Addressing Land Scarcity through Agroforestry and Allied Plantations

Gilgit-Baltistan’s topography limits the extent of arable land. Terraced fields carved along steep slopes already face threats of erosion and desertification. Here, agroforestry—the strategic integration of trees into agricultural landscapes—offers an efficient solution.
The Forest and Agriculture Departments must jointly promote:

  • Boundary and roadside plantations of fast-growing species like poplar, willow, and Russian olive.

  • Fruit-bearing species such as apple, cherry, apricot, and walnut in mixed cropping systems.

  • Silvo-pastoral systems where trees provide shade, fodder, and soil stabilization for grazing lands.

  • Community and household-level plantations in urban and semi-urban compounds to increase green cover and mitigate heat island effects.

Such initiatives not only expand green biomass in land-scarce areas but also diversify income sources for rural households.

4. Institutional Synergy and Policy Integration

To translate these goals into tangible outcomes, institutional synergy must move beyond inter-departmental coordination meetings. It should take the form of:

  • Joint planning cells for agroforestry and land rehabilitation projects.

  • Shared extension services that train farmers in both soil conservation and climate-smart agriculture.

  • Integrated monitoring frameworks to track reforestation, plantation survival rates, and agricultural productivity.

  • Unified policy guidelines under the broader umbrella of the Gilgit-Baltistan Climate Adaptation and Green Growth Strategy.

Such integration ensures that both departments complement rather than compete with each other, optimizing resources and achieving broader developmental and ecological goals.

5. Mobilizing Communities and Building Awareness

No strategy can succeed without local participation. The departments must jointly lead awareness and capacity-building campaigns to educate farmers, students, and women-led households about the benefits of tree-based systems, the value of native flora, and the importance of sustainable land use. Incentive programs—such as seed distribution, technical training, and recognition awards—can significantly boost participation.

6. The Road Ahead: Turning Challenges into Opportunities

The environmental and developmental challenges facing Gilgit-Baltistan are formidable, but they also present unique opportunities for innovation. With its vast altitudinal range, diverse microclimates, and motivated communities, the region can become a model for climate-resilient agroforestry in the greater Himalayan belt.

If the Forest and Agriculture Departments embrace this era of cooperation and innovation, Gilgit-Baltistan could not only secure its ecological balance but also set a precedent for other mountain regions struggling with similar challenges. In doing so, they would affirm that the path to resilience lies in shared vision, integrated planning, and collective stewardship of the land.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Episode 1: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-I, The Muslim dated July 4, 1997. By Syed Shamsuddin   Most of our people even today seem quite oblivious of the geo-political position of Northern Areas while the exact historical background concerning Gilgit-Baltistan and where these must stand politically remains yet another subject of discussion. Not to speak of a layman, a person of the stature of Chief Executive of the country, once inquired whether the Northern Areas an integral part of the north west frontier province (NWFP). This happened when he rule the country in the aftermath of martial law. Yet another minister on Kashmir and Northern Areas, during the democratic government that followed, was pleased to tell a member of the northern areas council that he owed his minisitership not to them (Northern Areas people) but to the turbaned man of his constituency, standing at the door of his official chambers. There is infact, dearth of substantial historical evidence as to when exactly man ...

Episode 4: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan part-1

A window to Northern Areas-IV, The Muslim dated July 7, 1997 Author: Syed Shams ud Din    The word providence in Sheena language equates with ‘bagharo’ and in this sense, it may safely be implied that the term Bagrote emanated from this word as the valley once famous for its agricultural produce, wildlife and richness in fruits hence the people living there were used to be called ‘bagharoos’ – those distributing basic necessities of life. This attribute seems to have later degenerated into Bagrote – the land of ‘bagharoos’ (distributors).  It has been noticed that the famous mythology of Gilgit is all in Brushiski which also includes that of Kirak Prince. The attribution of all the names to almost all places of what was formerly called the Brushal are a pointer to the firm hold of this kingdom in the past as a reality. The people of these areas, prior to Islam, all embraced ‘Shamanism’. A cursory glance over the ancient history of India may abundantly reveal the fa...

Episode 3: A Windows to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-III, The Muslim dated July 6,1997 Author: Syed Shamsuddin    In the ‘History of Jammu and Kashmir’ by Maulvi Hashmatullah Khan Lakhnavi, there is a mention of ancient rulers (Rajas) of Gilgit called Aghurtham and Baghurtham who have been famous rulers of Brushal. It is to be noted that the word ‘Tham’ in Brushaski means ruler. When delved deep, it transpires that the words like Berish (the land of Berish), Malokush, Kanjukush etc.,  were further embellished by the Tibetans, the Baltis and Ladakhis by pronouncing at ease as like Brushal in their own tongue. The Aghutham’s rock still lies amidst Gilgit river near Thopchar in Gilgit city which is called “Aghurthamai Giri”. Likewise, Aghurtham’s Forte is situated at Konodas, Gilgit near Gulsher Mohellah where the remains are. It has been observed that the carvings on the above rock and that of the Karagha nullah and the one at Hal Nal near Nagaral are identical and hence seem to have been engrave...