Skip to main content

Layered Steel Nets: A Swiss-Inspired Solution for Flood and Mudslide Disasters in Gilgit-Baltistan

By 


The other day, I came across a truly fascinating video on Facebook. It showcased how Switzerland, a country with mountainous terrain much like our own, has taken remarkable steps to confront the dangers of sudden mudslides, debris flows, and floodwaters laden with massive boulders. These natural hazards pose a constant threat to communities living in steep valleys, yet Swiss engineers have devised an ingenious solution to lessen their destructive force.

The technique involves the installation of three successive layers of high-tensile steel nets, carefully positioned along the course of potential mudslide channels. Each layer acts as a barrier, progressively slowing down, filtering, and dispersing the energy of the rushing debris. Instead of allowing an avalanche of rocks, mud, and water to barrel down unchecked, the nets absorb and distribute the impact, reducing it to a more manageable flow.

This simple yet highly effective approach reflects the kind of innovation that blends engineering foresight with respect for the power of nature—a model that could serve as an inspiration for other mountainous regions facing similar threats.

The first net barrier is anchored across the initial point where the floodwaters begin carrying heavy boulders and dense mud. Its purpose is to intercept and restrain the largest and most dangerous debris—such as massive rocks and logs—before they can gather momentum downstream. By holding back these oversized materials, the first layer substantially reduces the destructive energy of the flow.

The second net barrier is placed further downstream. This net captures medium-sized stones, mud clumps, and residual debris that have slipped through the first filter. The process of interception at this stage ensures that the flow becomes progressively lighter and less forceful.

Finally, the third net barrier performs a final filtration, restraining smaller but still hazardous materials. By the time the water passes this stage, the flood mass has been reduced to a relatively harmless slurry that can flow safely without causing major destruction to settlements, infrastructure, or farmland.

This tiered net system functions much like a progressive sieve, gradually transforming a destructive debris-laden torrent into a manageable water flow. The technique is highly effective because it does not attempt to stop the flood entirely—an impossible task—but instead dissipates its energy in stages and neutralizes its most dangerous components.

Had such a mechanism been installed in vulnerable nullahs and flood-prone sites across Gilgit-Baltistan, the tremendous losses suffered in recent disasters could have been greatly minimized. For instance, during the massive flood that struck Danyore on July 22, 2025, everything in the torrent’s path was swept away, including four irrigation channels and the piped drinking water supply network. The most destructive element of the disaster was not just the water, but the huge boulders carried along with the mudflow, which crushed infrastructure and carved new channels of destruction.

If a system of layered steel netting had been in place, these heavy boulders and debris could have been intercepted, leaving only filtered flows to pass downstream. While such filtered flows would still cause erosion, this could be managed by channeling the water through permanent concrete embankments, thereby keeping watercourses safe and protecting human settlements.

For Gilgit-Baltistan—the polar region of Pakistan and home to one of the world’s largest concentrations of glaciers—such engineering interventions are urgently needed. The region has become increasingly vulnerable to flash floods, mudslides, and glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs). Replicating Switzerland’s model could offer a practical, life-saving solution for mountain communities.

However, the successful implementation of this system requires international technical and financial assistance. Designing, funding, and installing multi-layered steel net barriers, combined with reinforced watercourses, would demand collaboration between local authorities, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), disaster management institutions, and international development partners. With such support, Gilgit-Baltistan could significantly reduce disaster risks and secure a safer future for its people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Episode 1: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-I, The Muslim dated July 4, 1997. By Syed Shamsuddin   Most of our people even today seem quite oblivious of the geo-political position of Northern Areas while the exact historical background concerning Gilgit-Baltistan and where these must stand politically remains yet another subject of discussion. Not to speak of a layman, a person of the stature of Chief Executive of the country, once inquired whether the Northern Areas an integral part of the north west frontier province (NWFP). This happened when he rule the country in the aftermath of martial law. Yet another minister on Kashmir and Northern Areas, during the democratic government that followed, was pleased to tell a member of the northern areas council that he owed his minisitership not to them (Northern Areas people) but to the turbaned man of his constituency, standing at the door of his official chambers. There is infact, dearth of substantial historical evidence as to when exactly man ...

Episode 4: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan part-1

A window to Northern Areas-IV, The Muslim dated July 7, 1997 Author: Syed Shams ud Din    The word providence in Sheena language equates with ‘bagharo’ and in this sense, it may safely be implied that the term Bagrote emanated from this word as the valley once famous for its agricultural produce, wildlife and richness in fruits hence the people living there were used to be called ‘bagharoos’ – those distributing basic necessities of life. This attribute seems to have later degenerated into Bagrote – the land of ‘bagharoos’ (distributors).  It has been noticed that the famous mythology of Gilgit is all in Brushiski which also includes that of Kirak Prince. The attribution of all the names to almost all places of what was formerly called the Brushal are a pointer to the firm hold of this kingdom in the past as a reality. The people of these areas, prior to Islam, all embraced ‘Shamanism’. A cursory glance over the ancient history of India may abundantly reveal the fa...

Episode 3: A Windows to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-III, The Muslim dated July 6,1997 Author: Syed Shamsuddin    In the ‘History of Jammu and Kashmir’ by Maulvi Hashmatullah Khan Lakhnavi, there is a mention of ancient rulers (Rajas) of Gilgit called Aghurtham and Baghurtham who have been famous rulers of Brushal. It is to be noted that the word ‘Tham’ in Brushaski means ruler. When delved deep, it transpires that the words like Berish (the land of Berish), Malokush, Kanjukush etc.,  were further embellished by the Tibetans, the Baltis and Ladakhis by pronouncing at ease as like Brushal in their own tongue. The Aghutham’s rock still lies amidst Gilgit river near Thopchar in Gilgit city which is called “Aghurthamai Giri”. Likewise, Aghurtham’s Forte is situated at Konodas, Gilgit near Gulsher Mohellah where the remains are. It has been observed that the carvings on the above rock and that of the Karagha nullah and the one at Hal Nal near Nagaral are identical and hence seem to have been engrave...