Skip to main content

Beyond Degrees: The Radiance of Character-Driven Knowledge

By 



One may have often reflected upon the saying, "Degrees are merely receipts for educational expenses; true knowledge is that which shines through one's character." This succinct yet powerful statement draws a clear distinction between formal education and the kind of wisdom that is lived out through humility, empathy, and ethical conduct.

It seems to stem from the collective observation of ordinary people, who, through their interactions with officials and administrators, have come to notice a recurring pattern: an unsettling disconnect between academic qualification and human decency.

In many encounters, particularly in bureaucratic or administrative contexts, this disconnect becomes painfully evident. What is especially disheartening is that even officials occupying the lowest rungs of the hierarchical ladder—clerks, assistants, or minor staff—often adopt an air of arrogance or haughtiness, mimicking the behavior of those in higher positions. This supercilious demeanor, which contradicts the very ideals of public service and human dignity, becomes a barrier rather than a bridge in their dealings with the public.

Instead of reflecting the refinement and responsibility that education should instill, such attitudes reflect a misguided sense of superiority, as though acquiring a title or passing a competitive exam somehow elevates one above the rest of humanity. The true purpose of education, however, is not to create hierarchies of pride, but to foster service, humility, and justice.

When officials—whether high-ranking or junior—treat the common citizen with indifference or disdain, it is not their knowledge that shines, but their ignorance of the very values education is meant to cultivate. The learned, in the truest sense of the word, are not those who expect reverence, but those who earn respect through integrity, compassion, and a sense of shared humanity.

In this light, the saying becomes more than a clever remark—it is a moral indictment of an educational culture that measures success by degrees rather than by character, and a call to re-center our understanding of knowledge as a transformative force, not just a credentialed achievement.


1. Critique of Superficial Credentials

Degrees are likened to receipts—proof that a person has completed formal studies and paid for that experience. While important in the practical world, these degrees do not necessarily reflect inner wisdom, ethical grounding, or refined character. They often become symbols of status rather than evidence of true learning.


2. True Knowledge Radiates from Within

True knowledge is something internal, deeply felt, and outwardly visible through humility, compassion, fairness, and an eagerness to serve others. It is not dependent on institutional approval, but on how one’s learning transforms one’s conduct, relationships, and sense of responsibility.


3. When Titles Breed Arrogance

In many societies, especially those with competitive civil or elite services, individuals who pass rigorous exams often develop an air of superiority. Such persons, now invested with power and privilege, may begin to see themselves as a distinct class, far removed from the ordinary citizen.

Their hauteur becomes visible in their public dealings—marked by dismissiveness, rigid formality, and at times, contempt for those deemed "beneath" them. It is as if they believe themselves descended from another planet, expecting reverence rather than connection, and authority rather than accountability.


4. A Misunderstanding of Education’s Purpose

This mindset reveals a tragic failure of true education. The purpose of education—and particularly of elite training—is not to elevate one's ego, but to broaden one’s capacity for empathy, justice, and service. Those who misuse their learning to assert dominance have missed the essence of knowledge, which is to illuminate, not overshadow; to uplift, not suppress.


5. The True Measure of an Educated Soul

The real sign of an educated individual lies not in their titles, grades, or positions, but in how they treat others, especially those with no power or influence. Humility, dignity in behavior, and moral strength—these are the lasting imprints of genuine knowledge.


Conclusion

This saying is a powerful reminder and critique in an age where degrees, ranks, and civil service badges are often worn like crowns. It urges us to look beyond outward credentials and ask: Has education made us better human beings? If not, then the receipt—however prestigious—is merely paper, and the real wealth of learning remains unearned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Episode 1: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-I, The Muslim dated July 4, 1997. By Syed Shamsuddin   Most of our people even today seem quite oblivious of the geo-political position of Northern Areas while the exact historical background concerning Gilgit-Baltistan and where these must stand politically remains yet another subject of discussion. Not to speak of a layman, a person of the stature of Chief Executive of the country, once inquired whether the Northern Areas an integral part of the north west frontier province (NWFP). This happened when he rule the country in the aftermath of martial law. Yet another minister on Kashmir and Northern Areas, during the democratic government that followed, was pleased to tell a member of the northern areas council that he owed his minisitership not to them (Northern Areas people) but to the turbaned man of his constituency, standing at the door of his official chambers. There is infact, dearth of substantial historical evidence as to when exactly man ...

Episode 4: A Window to Gilgit-Baltistan part-1

A window to Northern Areas-IV, The Muslim dated July 7, 1997 Author: Syed Shams ud Din    The word providence in Sheena language equates with ‘bagharo’ and in this sense, it may safely be implied that the term Bagrote emanated from this word as the valley once famous for its agricultural produce, wildlife and richness in fruits hence the people living there were used to be called ‘bagharoos’ – those distributing basic necessities of life. This attribute seems to have later degenerated into Bagrote – the land of ‘bagharoos’ (distributors).  It has been noticed that the famous mythology of Gilgit is all in Brushiski which also includes that of Kirak Prince. The attribution of all the names to almost all places of what was formerly called the Brushal are a pointer to the firm hold of this kingdom in the past as a reality. The people of these areas, prior to Islam, all embraced ‘Shamanism’. A cursory glance over the ancient history of India may abundantly reveal the fa...

Episode 3: A Windows to Gilgit-Baltistan

A window to Northern Areas-III, The Muslim dated July 6,1997 Author: Syed Shamsuddin    In the ‘History of Jammu and Kashmir’ by Maulvi Hashmatullah Khan Lakhnavi, there is a mention of ancient rulers (Rajas) of Gilgit called Aghurtham and Baghurtham who have been famous rulers of Brushal. It is to be noted that the word ‘Tham’ in Brushaski means ruler. When delved deep, it transpires that the words like Berish (the land of Berish), Malokush, Kanjukush etc.,  were further embellished by the Tibetans, the Baltis and Ladakhis by pronouncing at ease as like Brushal in their own tongue. The Aghutham’s rock still lies amidst Gilgit river near Thopchar in Gilgit city which is called “Aghurthamai Giri”. Likewise, Aghurtham’s Forte is situated at Konodas, Gilgit near Gulsher Mohellah where the remains are. It has been observed that the carvings on the above rock and that of the Karagha nullah and the one at Hal Nal near Nagaral are identical and hence seem to have been engrave...